[Challenges of coronary catheterization after TAVR]. / Difficultés de cathétérisme coronaire après TAVI.

PURPOSE: Coronary catheterization after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR) may be challenging. The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility of coronary catheterization and angioplasty according to each type of valve. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We retrospectively studied coronary angiography or percutaneous angioplasty procedures after TAVR in two different centers. The catheterization success of coronary artery was evaluated according to the quality of engagement in ostium and opacification of the artery. Other indicators were collected including catheters used, fluoroscopy and angiography times, DAP and the volume of the contrast agent. RESULTS: Among 1512 TAVR procedures, 33 patients were included. The Sapien 3® valve was implanted in 22 patients and the Evolut® in 11 patients (7 Evolut-R® and 4 Evolut Pro®). Coronary angiography with selective or partially selective catheterization has been successfully performed in all patients with a Sapien 3® valve. In the Evolut® group we identified 3 cases of non-selective catheterization for the right coronary and 1 case for the left coronary. Standard Judkins catheters seem to be the most suitable for both types of valve with very good efficiency. CONCLUSION: The results of our study is promising for the future of TAVR with a coronary catheterization success rate close to 100% with some difficulties for the Evolut® supra-annular valves. Special attention should be paid to the technique of implantation and orientation of cups in the aortic sinus.

[Common femoral artery bailout stenting with covered stent graft due to TAVR vascular complication: Clinical long term follow-up]. / Suivi clinique après implantation d'un stent couvert dans l'artère fémorale commune au décours immédiat d'une complication vasculaire per-TAVI.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications are frequent in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and may require the implantation of a covered stent graft in the common femforal artery. However, common femoral artery is considered to be at high risk of stent fracture or occlusion due to high mobility of the hip joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed medical records of patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement related vascular complications between 2015 and 2018, treated with commom femoral artery transluminal angioplasty or surgery. Vascular complications or suspect symptoms were followed up by phone calls. RESULTS: Among 552 patients, 43 patients were included. Twelve (11.6 %) were managed by prolonged balloon inflation, 5 (11.6 %) by first line surgery and 26 (60.4 %) by the implantation of a covered stent graft. Among the latter group, the covered stent graft was efficient in 24 patients (92.3 %). The median follow-up was 430 days [3-1499]. The first-line surgery group had a higher risk of red blood cell transfusion and all causes mortality. At follow-up, no patient had suspicious symptoms of vascular covered stent complication. Four patients (9.3 %) had US-doppler or CT vascular imaging at follow-up, showing no evidence of stent fracture or occlusion. CONCLUSION: In our study, the implantation of a covered stent graft in the common femoral artery was an efficient and safe strategy for the management of transcatheter aortic valve replacement related vascular complications.

[Intracardiac mass: Why not a liquefaction necrosis of a mitral annulus calcification?]. / Masse cardiaque: et si c'était une liquéfaction caséeuse de calcification mitrale?

We report the case of an asymptomatic 70-year-old woman with a liquefaction necrosis of mitral annulus calcification. This mass was discovered incidentally during an echocardiographic examination. Additional treatment was not performed because liquefaction necrosis of mitral calcification usually has a benign prognosic. A scheduled clinical review with an echocardiographic examination and cardiac MRI was planified. The patient is actually healthy without any complication.

FemoSeal Evaluation Registry (FER). Prospective study of femoral arterial closure with a mechanical system on 100 patients who underwent angioplasty procedures.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the FemoSeal mechanical closure system in order to obtain hemostasis of the puncture site following angioplasty procedures performed through femoral arterial approach. METHOD: A single-centre prospective registry was conducted from November 2010 to April 2011, comparing the results of manual compression (n=111 patients), hemostatic bandages compression (n=43 patients) and FemoSeal mechanical closure (n=100 patients). The end points evaluated were the following: successful hemostasis, major and minor complications right after the procedures and major and minor complications at 1 month follow-up. The patients' feedback about their comfort was also collected right after the procedure and after one month. RESULTS: Successful hemostasis with FemoSeal was obtained in 93% of the patients (n=93). Seven patients required additional slight manual compressions or compression bandages. The use of FemoSeal was not associated with any major complications, significantly reducing (P<0.05) the number of complications compared to other compression techniques over the studied period. Only one minor complication was observed with FemoSeal (a 1.5-cm-hematoma, which reabsorbed spontaneously without any issue). CONCLUSION: In our experience, the use of FemoSeal is effective in achieving hemostasis performed through femoral arterial approach up to 7F and is associated with a very low rate of complications.